COMMONWEALTH STEPS OUT OF ZAMBIA’S POLITICAL DIALOGUE PROCESS

Prof Gambari
The Commonwealth has stepped out of the dialogue process aimed at addressing the political impasse between Zambia’s ruling Patriotic Front and the main opposition party United Party for National Development and handed the process over to local in-country facilitators.
In August, 2017 Commonwealth Secretary General Patricia Scotland facilitated the release from prison of Zambia’s main opposition leader Hakainde Hichilema who was charged with treason for allegedly obstructing a presidential motorcade. She proceeded to appoint Professor Ibrahim  Gambari as her special envoy to facilitate a national political dialogue in Zambia. The purpose of the dialogue was to address national challenges and to enable the Republic of Zambia and its people to uphold its reputation for democracy, the rule of law and peace.
Addressing the press after his recent visit to Zambia Gambari said:
“Above all, there is a shared commitment to open-minded, to act with good faith and to ensure that the process is truly Zambian led and owned. We have talked about talks for long enough. Now is the time for dialogue to start. The foundations of the dialogue process are a shared respect for the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms and respect for one another.”
On 10th March, 2018 Prof Gambari announced the formation of a steering committee comprised of eminent and respected Zambians which will lead and direct the dialogue process.
 “As I depart, I can safely say that Zambians have committed themselves to a national political dialogue including the following: peace, respect for the separation of powers between the three branches of government, an independent electoral process, end to political violence, the right to freedom of expression, an end to tribalism, regionalism, and all forms of discrimination, good governance,” Prof Gambari said.
Hichilema chats with his Vice President Geoffrey Mwamba in court
The main objectives of the dialogue process were to promote peace, national cohesion and political tolerance and reconciliation in Zambia.
President Lungu through his spokesperson Amos Chanda announced that he was eagerly looking forward to speedy talks and was committed to open and sincere dialogue to foster national cohesion.
Some elements close to the ruling indicate that the ruling party was unhappy with an eternal facilitated dialogue process arguing that Zambians should be mature enough to solve their ow political disputes as was the case just very recently in Kenya.
Some public sentiments are that if the Commonwealth sent the envoy to Zambia in order to facilitate constitutional reforms, electoral and institutional reforms, it would not be a fruitful process because those issues are better known by the people of Zambia.
There are also fears that the dialogue process may result in a postmortem of the 2016 general elections which the ruling party won by a disputed small margin. Their election petition also fell off in the Constitution Court on a technicality of lapse of time. The grievances arising from that election are still top of the agenda as far as the main opposition is concerned, hence they seem to be seeking closure.
The local steering committee will be formally launched on March 26, 2018 in Lusaka. Stakeholders including members of the international community will be invited to witness the event.
Furthermore, the process will include the establishment of a working group, including three sub-groups which will examine the issues of Constitutional and institutional reforms, electoral reforms and tolerance and civility in public life.
Upon his release from prison UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema reiterated his commitment to national building and dialogue stressing that he was not bitter and angry about the humiliation and torture he suffered from the PF government.
 “Africa does not need conflict [but] what Africa needs, Zambia included, is accelerated economic and social development. So for me, would I say I’ll not dialogue because I’m unhappy with this thing (his incarceration)? I wouldn’t say that!  I’ll bring that issue which I’m not happy about and put it on the dialogue table and I think that’s the most civilised way of doing things. If we are saying I disagree with you and you also disagree with me and so, we cannot resolve our conflicts, then we’ve lost the sense of humanity because amongst the creatures God made, the one with intellect is a human being. That intellect must be used to resolve conflicts because if you don’t want to resolve conflicts through dialogue, the next thing basically is negative things, including violence. [But] do we want violence? Absolutely no! Yes, we have problems in our country but we can resolve them,
Hichilema said.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harnessing the untapped youth divident

Each year in Zambia, 240, 000 young people enter the job market and join the thousands already in search of employment. The youth in Zambia have been waiting for a future that seems consistently illusive. Despite Zambia recording over the past decade an economic growth rate averaging 7% this growth has not resulted in improvements in the socio-economic conditions of Zambians. The youth crisis is more real now than at any other time in history and it can only get worse if we do not introduce radical measures. Zambia is a youthful country, with approximately 74 percent of its 14 million total population under the age of 30 (28 percent are 15 to 29 years-old). Annual population growth rate estimates range from 2.4 to 3 percent, and projections indicate a population of 24.5 million by 2030 according to the 2013 Human Development Report At a launch meeting for a youth sectoral analysis report last week, USAID Mission Director Dr Susan K. Brems, introduced a catch phrase, “youth dividen...
Read more

Have we lost the people?

Image
The case of civil society and land policy advocacy in Zambia… By Bruce Chooma SINCE the attainment of independence in 1964, Zambia has failed to put in place a comprehensive land policy. All land reforms after 1964 were triggered by specific needs at each particular time. A lot of concern is rising from various quarters inside and outside Zambia on the dwindling voice of civil society in Zambia’s governance space. Such a strong voice is necessary to hold government in check and accountable to its people as it is a conduit for the amplification of citizen voices. This article seeks to reflect on the strategies employed by civil society over the years in championing the rights of Zambians to access and control land. This is premised on the fact that, the land question is essentially what the fight for independence was about. That the land is the heritage of the Zambian and generations of Zambians to come must be assured that concrete steps were taken to preserve their land fo...
Read more

Why the Constitution Impasse?

THE Patriotic Front Government is not committed to protecting and upholding the popular will of the Zambian people with regards to the enactment of a new republican constitution. The current constitution impasse has exposed them for who they truly are. Zambians have held a consistent position on the key governance issues they want changed in the constitution that are now referred to as contentious issues. They have consistently demanded for the introduction of social-economic rights in the bill of rights, the election of a vice president as a running mate to the president, overhaul of the electoral system to provide for a popularly elected president by a threshold of at least 50+1 of total votes cast and a system of representation that also caters for disadvantaged groups. The other issues are the appointment of cabinet from outside parliament, reduction in the powers of the president and of the executive arm of government, greater parliamentary oversight in the contraction of forei...
Read more