THE CHAOTIC SCENE OF LAND ADMINISTRATION IN ZAMBIA


courtesy of un.org
ZAMBIA is in a bizarre position when it comes to land administration and management. No one knows how much land is available for various purposes. For over 20 years the Zambian government has insisted that only 6% of land in Zambia is state land the remaining 94% is customary when in fact a lot of land has since been converted from customary to state land across the country but without any reliable system of records at the Ministry of Lands the true position is unclear.
With a dual system of land tenure; customary and leasehold tenure, Zambia’s land is vested in the President on behalf of all Zambians, the issue of vestment itself is one that lacks widespread consensus particularly among the traditional leadership.
Some experts have argued that the dual land system of tenure is a drawback to sustained development and others have suggested that Zambia needs to consider adopting freehold tenure as this would guarantee owners of land the necessarily security to warrant investments and sustainable use. Freehold tenure entails full private ownership of land free of obligations to the state except for the payment of land taxes and observance of other statutory land use controls. This is opposed to leasehold tenure which Zambia uses which entails access to land on a lease basis such that one has the right to land for a specific period of time and subject to the continued fulfilment of specified conditions like paying ground rent. In Zambia the defined period is 99 years.
The Zambian government does not have a land policy. The last draft of the policy was made in 2006 and the process of trying to put in place a land policy document has gone for over 10 years now and to date nothing new has come out of the process. Land Policies try to enhance security of tenure; improve access to credit; facilitate land reform; ensure collection of real property taxes; prevention of land speculation, disputes and conflicts; and ensure equitable access to land for the poor, minority groups and women.
Zambia therefore needs to manage land in a manner that realises economic/sustainable development and peace. This cannot happen in the absence of a good land policy to effectively administer this precious resource in such a way that will lead to economic development whilst ensuring environmental sustainability and social development.
Recently the government announced its intentions to conduct a land audit to ascertain how much land was owned by the state and how much is customary and how much land in the hands of private citizens is developed or not. This is a welcome move if at all it gets underway anytime soon.
Competition for land, particularly in urban and peri-urban settings, is increasingly intensifying partly as a result of population growth. This has led to disputes between countries (e.g. the current Zambia and Malawi boundary disputes) and also disputes between Chiefdoms over boundaries and ownership of certain pieces of land.
An important issue for Zambia to decide on is whether to promote a conservationist approach or continue with its large scale acquisition policy of land for economic investment mostly by foreign investors. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that conservationist approaches that put the community at the centre of land ownership, use and management do work. The Namibian example is the closest to home.   Namibia adopted the ground breaking Nature Conservation Amendment Act in 1996.
The granting of legal rights to communities restored their sense of ownership and responsibility, and thereby created incentives for conservation. With the rights came the obligation of sustainable wildlife management.
The conservation paradigm in Namibia has shifted from a situation where government conservation officers and rural communities were constantly in conflict over alleged poaching incidences, to a situation where community conservation is considered a viable rural development option in Namibia’s National Development Plans and Poverty Reduction Strategy.
By the end of 2011, 65 communal conservancies were established, covering over 14 million hectares or 17% of the country; involving over 240 000 community members or 12% of the total population. Conservancies are legally recognized, geographically defined areas that have been formed by communities who have united to manage and benefit from wildlife and other natural resources. Conservancies generate bulk of their income from tourism joint venture partnerships with private sector, sustainable wildlife use, campsites, crafts, guiding, info centres, indigenous plant harvesting, etc.
Total income to communities from conservation related activities was over US$6.2 Million in 2010, while private sector generated at least US$23 million in returns from community conservation related enterprises. This approach in Namibia generated over 1250 full-time and 8000 seasonal employees thus contributing to job creation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harnessing the untapped youth divident

Have we lost the people?

Why the Constitution Impasse?