ZAMBIAN AUTHORITIES CRACK WHIP ON OPPOSITION: 48 MPs SUSPENDED FROM PARLIAMENT
Zambia’s leading opposition
political party, United Party for National Development (UPND) has continued to
receive a bashing from the Patriotic Front government with the church and civil
society raising alarm at what they describe as an accelerated move towards a
dictatorship. Zambia now has a situation where the president of the main
opposition party is in indefinite detention and where there is effectively no
opposition party in the National Assembly. The Party’s President Hakainde
Hichilema remains incarcerated on charges of treason after his motorcade
allegedly blocked President Lungu’s motorcade as they both drove to a
traditional ceremony in western Zambia.
Hichilema was recently committed
to the High Court and forcefully airlifted from Lusaka Central Prison to a
maximum remand prison in Central Zambia. The prison is famous for housing dangerous
hard core criminals and inmates on death row. His lawyers lamented that they
could no longer guarantee his safety and his wife and family members have complained
of great difficulties in accessing the incarcerated leader despite a recent
court order granting wider visitation rights.
When parliament resumed sitting
on Tuesday 13th June, 2017, another shock was to hit Hichilema as
the speaker of the National Assembly Patrick Matibini referred the matter in
which the UPND leader is alleged to have issued disparaging and contemptuous
remarks against him to the Police Inspector General for criminal
investigations. He also referred him to the Director of Public Prosecution for
possible prosecution in line with laws of the National Assembly.
Hichilema was not the only one to
receive the knocks, 48 out of his 58 Members of Parliament were also banished
from the house for one month without pay. The opposition MPs suspension from
the house relates to what the speaker describes as the unauthorised absence of
the UPND Members of Parliament from the House on Friday 17th March, 2017, when President
Lungu, delivered the State of the Nation Address on the Application of
Constitutional Values and Principles to the House.
“I have, in exercise of my powers
under section 28 (2) of the National Assembly (Powers and Privileges) Act
decided to suspend the 48 UPND Members of Parliament from the service of the
National Assembly for a period of thirty (30) days, with effect from today, the
13th June, 2017…Finally, I wish to inform you that in accordance with section
28 (3) of the National Assembly (Powers and Privileges) Act, during the period
of your suspension, you shall not: (1) enter the precincts of the Assembly and
this extends to the National Assembly Motel; (2) participate in any business or
activity of the House or a committee that you assigned in, in your capacity as
Members of the National Assembly; and (3) be paid a salary or allowance that
you are entitled to as a Member.” speaker Matibini ruled.
The ruling has far reaching
implications on the legislature. Committees will not be sitting because most
members are back benchers and most committee chairs are opposition MPs. Bills
also can’t pass properly given that even the remaining 10 UPND are likely to
also stay away. It is even worse that the 14 independent MPs usually vote with
the ruling PF together with the three Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD)
whose party is in alliance with the PF.
There are genuine fears that the
PF may bulldoze its way and pass controversial bills considering that there
will be no opposition voice in the house. Opposition members are already
raising fears the PF may succeed to pass legislation to revert to a one party
state and also enact a law to dissolve the Law Association of Zambia, whose
criticism of government has greatly unsettled the ruling party.
There was a plot to dissolve the
Law Association of Zambia spearheaded by MPs from the ruling party that failed.
PF Kasama MP also published a private members bill to facilitate for the enactment
of a law that would bring in place a new law society. It is possible that such
a law may be pushed in in the absence of the opposition.
Some analysts have argued that
whilst the Speaker acted within the bounds of the law as he has the authority
to suspend any MP who stays away from the House without permission, the mass suspension
of 48 opposition MPs was punitive, unprecedented and a brazen assault on
parliamentary democracy. Political analyst Shishuwa Shishuwa observed that the
UPND is the leading parliamentary opposition party with 58 MPs (10 of whom had
permission to be absent from the National Assembly on the material day), and
suspending such a high number of lawmakers, especially at a time when its
leader is in prison on a non-bailable charge of treason, suggests an organised
effort to weaken the party.
Speaker Matibini argued that the
suspended MPs had broken the oath of allegiance to the President.
“Therefore, by taking the oath of
allegiance, the UPND Members are expected to be respectful to the Head of State
and Government. Therefore, by boycotting the presence of the President in the
House, when they previously swore allegiance to the President, the Members were
being disloyal, disobedient and in fact, violated their oath of office…”he said.
The suspended MPs have sought
judicial review of their suspension.
UPND Parliamentary Chief Whip
Garry Nkombo addressed the press flanked by his fellow suspended MPs and warned
that posterity will judge Speaker of the National Assembly Dr Patrick Matibini
for his emotional decision to suspend 48 opposition MPs. He expressed fear that
the Patriotic Front wanted to manipulate the Constitution in the absence of the
UPND MPs.
He charged that the suspension
would not change the MPs one bit but that they would emerge stronger. Nkombo
reminded the speaker that the suspected MPs were elected members and not
appointed or nominated.
“This is how dictatorship begins,
this is how the dictatorship asserts itself. And for now maybe to also just say
on behalf of all the constituencies that are represented by the members
affected here is to say just be steadfast, we are coming home for a month, it
will be such a joyful thing to be with yourselves. And finally it always is a
good thing to remember that when you are half way up, it means you are halfway
down. UPND is holding half of the seats in this country. We can only appeal to
all right minded people of this country to see what is going on, to see that
the state institutions are being manipulated on a daily basis so that by the
time they finish with us if they ever manage, there will be no country to talk
about,” said Nkombo.
The Oasis Forum, a consortium of
leading governance civil society organisations has launched a lawful
peace-building initiative and appealed to Zambians to participate in public
activities.
“We now live
under a cloud
of fear that prevents
us from expressing who we
really are. The Bemba people have
a saying, "lmbwa ya mukali tayi chenjela". Loosely translated, it
means that a child raised to be fearful of his parents will not prosper. We are indeed a very poor nation in every
respect. Gone is our national pride. We
have come to a
point in time where
we have to choose
prosperity over poverty; peace and unity over destruction and despair. That choice is the power that lies in the
hands of every Zambian citizen, regardless of race, tribe, creed, gender or
political affiliation, to say that enough
is enough. If we
do not participate in the
governance of our country, we
will only have ourselves to blame if we lose all that we hold dear.
Silence is consent. We must speak
out to reclaim our nation
and once again
raise our flag as a
symbol of our
national pride. Zambia is bigger
than any individual in the nation.” Linda
Kasonde, Oasis Forum chairperson said. Linda is also President of the Law
Association of Zambia.
The background to this matter is that whilst
the ruling Patriotic Front (PF) retained power by winning both the presidency
and the majority of seats in the National Assembly last August, the election
was marred by serious irregularities that resulted in a presidential petition
and more than 80 parliamentary petitions. The decision on the presidential
petition was inconclusive as the Constitutional Court disposed of the matter
without ever hearing the evidence and fell short of declaring Lungu the winner
as required by the Constitution. To the extent that the petitioners’ case was
not heard, they petitioned the High Court on the constitutionality of being
denied their right to be heard as stipulated in Article 18 of the Constitution.
This case remains before the High Court and the UPND argues that the party will
not recognise Lungu’s election until its legal challenge is conclusively
disposed of – a position that appears to greatly inconvenience the governing
authorities.
Comments
Post a Comment