POLITICS OF INCONSISTENCY

THE most consistent feature of Zambian politics is inconsistency. The saddest part of it all is that the vast majority of citizens take no keen interest in politics yet it is the decisions of politicians that are responsible for the progress or lack of progress that characterises various facets of our existence as a collective community of Zambians.  The decisions of today’s political office bearers will continue to yield fruits for generations to come. The national debt issue is a classic example of the impact of political choices on future generations.

The debts that our founding father acquired to build the country and deal with economic challenges then came back to haunt the country in ways that not only significantly affected the quality of life of Zambians but also resulted in premature death of a lot of them.   The Patriotic Front government is back on the path of borrowing this time not only from development finance institutions with concessional terms but also from open markets with high interest rates and stringent repayment terms. The Patriotic Front may not be in power in 2024 when both euro bonds fall due.  The current crop of leaders may not live long enough to witness the vulture funds land on national assets in a bid to recover unpaid debts.

In a more progressive society in as far as democracy and good governance are concerned the statement by Patriotic Front Secretary General Davies Chama to the effect that the party and government does not mind creating a one party state, would not go without widespread condemnation, punishment and protest.

 It is a shame that no one in the rank and file of the ruling party sees anything wrong with such a statement. Even more worrying is the fact that the statement has come at a time when the ruling party has literally swallowed up and obliterated a once vibrant political party in the Movement for Multi Party Democracy MMD. It is a shame that through the actions of the PF and its desire to dominate the political landscape of the country a credible voice in providing checks and balances is now at the verge of extinction.

Many Zambian living today may not have ben around when Zambia went through the one party state phase and may not fully understand what it means. The democracy we enjoy today whereby we have fundamental freedoms of expression, access to information, movement,  assembly and religion and conscience among others would not have existed without a determination to retain to multi-party democracy.

The animal of one party participatory democracy was nothing but a vehicle for totalitarian rule were the choices and decisions of a head of state cannot go unchallenged. This is what the PF desires, a state where critical voices can be silenced, where loans no matter how colossal can be secretly acquired without citizens knowing or questioning; when one would be proud to go into a general election and stand against a frog.

What is it that the PF have seen in being in power that they never saw when they were opposition? Would the PF had been in government today if MMD had chosen to abandon its principled position on plural politics?

The Patriotic Front have tasted the sweetness of incumbency. The amount of resources at its disposal are exciting and overwhelming. They can secure benefits through employment in the civil service and parastatals, through supply contracts to government and other means.

This is a political party that formed a company specifically to participate in bidding of supply contracts. The PF have realised how nice it is to control markets and bus stations. It is no wonder cries to have these places run by the council continue to fail whilst co-boys collect monies from bus operators without any form of accountability. They perceive a vibrant opposition as an obstacle to the enjoyment of the free flow of these benefits.

Can Zambians rise to the occasion and demand the protection of their democratic rights to enjoy plural politics? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harnessing the untapped youth divident

Each year in Zambia, 240, 000 young people enter the job market and join the thousands already in search of employment. The youth in Zambia have been waiting for a future that seems consistently illusive. Despite Zambia recording over the past decade an economic growth rate averaging 7% this growth has not resulted in improvements in the socio-economic conditions of Zambians. The youth crisis is more real now than at any other time in history and it can only get worse if we do not introduce radical measures. Zambia is a youthful country, with approximately 74 percent of its 14 million total population under the age of 30 (28 percent are 15 to 29 years-old). Annual population growth rate estimates range from 2.4 to 3 percent, and projections indicate a population of 24.5 million by 2030 according to the 2013 Human Development Report At a launch meeting for a youth sectoral analysis report last week, USAID Mission Director Dr Susan K. Brems, introduced a catch phrase, “youth dividen...
Read more

Have we lost the people?

Image
The case of civil society and land policy advocacy in Zambia… By Bruce Chooma SINCE the attainment of independence in 1964, Zambia has failed to put in place a comprehensive land policy. All land reforms after 1964 were triggered by specific needs at each particular time. A lot of concern is rising from various quarters inside and outside Zambia on the dwindling voice of civil society in Zambia’s governance space. Such a strong voice is necessary to hold government in check and accountable to its people as it is a conduit for the amplification of citizen voices. This article seeks to reflect on the strategies employed by civil society over the years in championing the rights of Zambians to access and control land. This is premised on the fact that, the land question is essentially what the fight for independence was about. That the land is the heritage of the Zambian and generations of Zambians to come must be assured that concrete steps were taken to preserve their land fo...
Read more

Why the Constitution Impasse?

THE Patriotic Front Government is not committed to protecting and upholding the popular will of the Zambian people with regards to the enactment of a new republican constitution. The current constitution impasse has exposed them for who they truly are. Zambians have held a consistent position on the key governance issues they want changed in the constitution that are now referred to as contentious issues. They have consistently demanded for the introduction of social-economic rights in the bill of rights, the election of a vice president as a running mate to the president, overhaul of the electoral system to provide for a popularly elected president by a threshold of at least 50+1 of total votes cast and a system of representation that also caters for disadvantaged groups. The other issues are the appointment of cabinet from outside parliament, reduction in the powers of the president and of the executive arm of government, greater parliamentary oversight in the contraction of forei...
Read more